Introduction: Typhonian Traditions
If you have a fascination for Thelema and contemporary occult traditions, you may have heard of Kenneth Grant and the Typhonian Tradition, a self-initiatory magic order named after a monstrous serpentine giant and one of the deadliest creatures in Greek mythology, Typhon!
Well, buckle up because that’s what we’re going to explore in this episode!
Hello everyone, I’m Dr Angela Puca, and welcome to my Symposium. I’m a PhD and a University Lecturer and this is your online resource for the academic study of Magic, Paganism, Shamanism, Esotericism, and all things occult.
In this episode, we are going to tackle the Typhonian tradition.
Kenneth Grant
Kenneth Grant (23 May 1924 – 15 January 2011) was an English ceremonial magician, apprentice of Aleister Crowley, and a close friend of Austin Osman Spare. Since the 1970s he had published numerous exegeses of both Crowley’s and Spare’s thoughts. Grant’s work, as we will see, was influential upon the Thelemic tradition as well as on Chaos Magick (Woodman, 2003, p.34).
Let’s start with his role in the OTO.
The Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO)
The Ordo Templi Orientis, sometimes also spelt as “Order of Oriental Templars”, is an Occultist organisation and initiatic Order, founded at the beginning of the 20th century and has remained, up to the present, a significant vehicle for the transmission of esoteric ideas and practices.
Among its major features, we find the practice of sex magick, deemed as one of its core teachings.
This aspect, along with the role accorded to Eastern doctrines, makes the OTO unique compared to several other magically-oriented, occultist societies, and especially to the only other order holding similar impact and visibility: the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Pasi, 2006, p.898).
Founding of the Typhonian OTO
Within the OTO, Kenneth Grant’s influence is displayed as the founder of the so-called ‘Typhonian’ OTO, later known as Typhonian Tradition, whose first official announcement was published around 1973 (Bogdan & Starr, 2012, p.7).
Gerald Yorke
As Henrik Bogdan illustrates – During the 1950s, Karl Germer, who had taken over the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO) after Crowley, collaborated with Gerald Yorke, a former Crowley disciple and collector of his works, to make transcript copies of all the surviving Crowley letters, diaries, and manuscripts. Grant took part in this project, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, by transcribing materials for Yorke and Germer. Later, in the late 1960s, Grant also collaborated with Crowley’s literary executor, John Symonds, for the publication of a number of Crowley’s works (Bogdan, 2012, p.101).
Having served as Crowley’s secretary during the last years of his life, Grant had received in the early 1950s a charter from Germer to create an OTO Lodge in England. However, a conflict arose between Germer and Grant in 1955 as the latter rejected the legitimacy of the Crowley-Germer succession, leading Germer to expel him from the order. Shortly after this event, Grant claimed the position of Outer Head of the Order for himself (Pasi, 2006, p.905).
[The whole OTO, including all its national bodies, is ruled by an international leader, called “Outer Head of the Order” (OHO, the name was probably borrowed from theosophical parlance) p.903.
The Typhonian Trilogies
As Marco Pasi explains, In the early 1970s Grant began his career as an independent writer and published the first volumes of a series of three Typhonian Trilogies (completed in 2002).
In these works, Grant offered an original interpretation of Crowley’s writings, partly based on his direct experiences in the workings of his lodge(Pasi, 2006, p.905).
Grant’s work is tightly rooted in the Thelemic tradition, even though traditionalists within the movement perceive his work as unorthodox and idiosyncratic. Grant discusses “The Book of the Law” profusely in his works, and it is made plain that he shared several of Crowley’s beliefs, including the upcoming transition from the Old Aeon to the New marked by violent upheaval (Bogdan, 2012, p.101).
Differently from the Caliphate OTO, which represents a more “orthodox” wing in the nebula of Crowleyan movements, Grant has included several elements previously absent in OTO traditions.
For instance, knowledge derived from communications with “extraterrestrial entities” – employed as a means to claim his authority – and a renewed emphasis on Eastern doctrines, Tantrism in particular – as we explored in a dedicated episode.
Influences on Kenneth Grant
Grant’s system is also characterised by a strong influence from the works of other occultists such as Austin Osman Spare (1886-1956), as well as from literary themes, particularly the Cthulhu mythology of Howard Phillips (H.P.) Lovecraft (1890-1937). (Pasi, 2006, p.905). Kenneth Grant is also quite influential in Chaos Magick. A close friend of one of the theoretical founding fathers of this tradition, Austin Osman Spare, Grant offered his own interpretation of Spare’s work.
Atavistic Resurgence
Grant maintains that Spare’s main magical “formula” was that of “atavistic resurgence”; namely, ‘that within trance states, the magician is able to experience the undifferentiated life-force of Kia in the atavistic, primordial levels of human consciousness.’
Consequently, Grant sees the spiritual journey as moving somewhat “downwards” or inwards, through the Tree of Life, instead of upwards as it’s taught by most ceremonial traditions, including the Golden Dawn.
Tunnels of Set
Spiritual and magical evolution is, in this sense, fostered by exploration and understanding of the chthonic levels of the psyche, the underworld of the human mind. This is why much of his work is concerned with the “demonic” forces inhabiting the “Tunnels of Set”, which exist on the “flipside” of the Tree of Life.
As Woodman explains, Grant believed that these powerful forces carry ‘the potential to radically transform the magician’s consciousness, and propel it into a state which lies beyond both being and non-being.’
Grant sees this process as highly dangerous, even though the inhabitants of the Tunnels of Set are not perceived as evil forces. The reason why we may perceive them as such is that they are foreign to everyday human consciousness.
In Woodman’s words, ‘By embracing the demonic as an idiom of alien otherness, the self-other divide is collapsed, the Magician is projected into the undifferentiated continuum of cosmic consciousness and, ultimately, toward an evolution into new, “extraterrestrial” or “extradimensional” modes of being.’
These ideas influenced widely the countercultural discourses that gave rise to and theoretical-practical inspiration to Chaos Magick (Woodman, 2003, pp.34–35).
Support Angela’s Symposium
This is it for today’s video. Thanks for staying with me until this point.
This project can only exist thanks to your support so if you like my content and want me to keep the Academic Fun going, please consider supporting my work with a one-off PayPal donation, by joining Memberships or my Inner Symposium on Patreon, where you will get access to our exclusive Discord server, monthly lectures and lots of other perks depending on your chosen tier.
And if you did like this video, don’t forget to SMASH the like button, subscribe to the channel, and activate the notification bell so you will never miss a new upload from me.
And as always, stay tuned for all the Academic Fun!
Bye for now.
REFERENCES
Bogdan, H. (2012) Envisioning the Birth of a New Aeon. In: H. Bogdan & M. P. Starr eds.
Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.89–106.
LINK: https://amzn.to/3lgVWvJ
Bogdan, H. & Starr, M.P. eds. (2012) Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism. Oxford University Press.
LINK: https://amzn.to/3lgVWvJ
Pasi, M. (2006) Ordo Templi Orientis. In: W. J. Hanegraaff ed. Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism. Leiden ; Boston, Brill, pp.898–906.
LINK: https://amzn.to/2ZxwHxI
Woodman, J. (2003) Modernity, selfhood, and the demonic : anthropological perspectives on ‘Chaos magick’ in the United Kingdom. Ph.D. Goldsmiths, University of London.
First uploaded 27 Nov 2021